AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+258%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4096
96
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0
