AMD FirePro D500 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1416 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+1446%
2.227 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
120
96
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
274W
TDP
73W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV630
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
