Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +462%
2.176 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G92B
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy