AMD FirePro A320 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 448SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1800MHz vs 955MHz)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 448SP
+120%
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Trinity
Generation
Lucienne
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
7
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
448
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.226 TFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Lucienne
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
9.8 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
