AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel GMA 3100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock955MHz
384 additional rendering cores
Intel GMA 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 100W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2007
Trinity
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
-
955 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Bearlake
A320
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0
