ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada
+116025%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
80
Shading Units
18432
8
TMUs
576
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
AD102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
