Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA P102 101

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
P102 101 +13262%
10.69 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2018
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
80
Shading Units
3200
8
TMUs
200
4
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
GP102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net