ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X800 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 128MB VRAM Radeon X800 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 49W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R400 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
350 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
R423
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
R423 GTO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R400
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.16 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
289 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0b (9_2)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-
