ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT Dual
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 XT Dual to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 22.08GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
690 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.08GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.360 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x Molex
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
RV530
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0
