Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V3750

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 48W)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750 +340%
0.352 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

17W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
RV730
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net