ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Lower TDP (17W vs 30W)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
+523%
0.499 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Oland
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
