ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+16537%
13.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2150 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.62 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
832.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Navi 22
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT
(215-127000144)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
