ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+4252%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
