ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (17W vs 19W)
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
NVS 315
+25%
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
80
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GF119
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
