ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
+860%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2011
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Turks
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
