ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
16816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+75300%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
141GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
80
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GH100
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
80 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A
