ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (17W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
+450%
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
R600
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
