ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (17W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
+645%
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
80
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GT200B
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
