ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+9883%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.0
