ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI FirePro V8800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
+3200%
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1600
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
208W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Cypress
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
