ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM RTX A5000 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
8112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A5000 8Q
+34612%
27.77 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
64
80
Shading Units
8192
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
GA102
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
