ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro D500
+2683%
2.227 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
