ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
+2620%
2.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
