ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
7640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+123743%
39.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
40
Shading Units
7680
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
210W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
AD103
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
