ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT
+62118%
19.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 48
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
