ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1905MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5700 XT
+30381%
9.754 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1605 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1905 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.9 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
304.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.51 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.754 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
609.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Navi 10
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XT
(215-0917210)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
