ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FirePro W2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (26W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
+1259%
0.435 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
26W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Oland
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
