ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.7GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 465
+2571%
0.855 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
102.7GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
11
40
Shading Units
352
4
TMUs
44
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.38 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
855.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
106.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GF100
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GF100-030-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
