ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380X
+12315%
3.973 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1425 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
182.4GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.973 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.973 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
248.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Antigua
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Antigua XT
(215-0877016)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
