Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S30

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S30

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM MTT S30 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 40W)
Moore Threads MTT S30 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
MTT S30 +8218%
2.662 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
SM Count
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
83.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.325 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.662 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
41.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net