ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450
+1778%
0.601 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GF106
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
