ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.64GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (18W vs 32W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
NVS 300
+21%
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
40
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
18W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GT218
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
