Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +76712%
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
8192
4
TMUs
512
4
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
22 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net