ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 83W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2005
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
83W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
NV41
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
TeraScale
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
