ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 350W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (936.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3090
+111087%
35.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1219 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
936.2GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
82
40
Shading Units
10496
4
TMUs
328
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
328
-
RT Cores
82
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.58 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
556.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA102
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GA102-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
