ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
+181%
0.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
32
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
G96C
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
G96-300-C1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
