ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
+1762%
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GT200B
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
