ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
+15609%
5.027 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
40
Shading Units
1408
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
TU116
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
