ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Intel Arc Pro A60
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60
+26140%
8.397 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG2-256
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
