ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
H200 NVL
+188400%
60.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
141GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
40
Shading Units
16896
4
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GH100
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
80 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
