ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 285W)
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
110
-
Shading Units
14080
4
TMUs
440
4
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
440
-
RT Cores
110
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
433.0 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1082 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
69.27 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
69.27 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1082 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
285W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Rage 9
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
