ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 32W)
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
40
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1
