ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1
