ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Lower TDP (20W vs 31W)
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GT216
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
-
Shader Model
4.1
