ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1
