ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FirePro W9100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.3
