ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2010
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1
