ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 180W)
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
180W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
130 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.7
