ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FirePro D500
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
5.1
