ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
-
Shader Model
5.1
